nanog mailing list archives

Re: Hijacked Network Ranges


From: Keegan Holley <keegan.holley () sungard com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 13:24:58 -0500

2012/1/31 Justin M. Streiner <streiner () cluebyfour org>

On Tue, 31 Jan 2012, Grant Ridder wrote:

 What is keeping you from advertising a more specific route (i.e /25's)?


Many providers filter out anything longer (smaller) than /24.


Some will accept it but not propagate it upstream.  This may be useful in
redirecting all the traffic from a large AS if you are directly connected.



jms


 On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Kelvin Williams <kwilliams () altuscgi com
wrote:

 Greetings all.

We've been in a 12+ hour ordeal requesting that AS19181 (Cavecreek
Internet
Exchange) immediately filter out network blocks that are being advertised
by ASAS33611 (SBJ Media, LLC) who provided to them a forged LOA.

The routes for networks: 208.110.48.0/20, 63.246.112.0/20, and
68.66.112.0/20 are registered in various IRRs all as having an origin AS
11325 (ours), and are directly allocated to us.

The malicious hijacking is being announced as /24s therefore making route
selection pick them.

Our customers and services have been impaired.  Does anyone have any
contacts for anyone at Cavecreek that would actually take a look at ARINs
WHOIS, and IRRs so the networks can be restored and our services back in
operation?

Additionally, does anyone have any suggestion for mitigating in the
interim?  Since we can't announce as /25s and IRRs are apparently a pipe
dream.

--
Kelvin Williams
Sr. Service Delivery Engineer
Broadband & Carrier Services
Altus Communications Group, Inc.


"If you only have a hammer, you tend to see every problem as a nail." --
Abraham Maslow







Current thread: