nanog mailing list archives
Re: Hijacked Network Ranges
From: Jonathan Lassoff <jof () thejof com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 10:27:28 -0800
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Grant Ridder <shortdudey123 () gmail com> wrote:
Hi, What is keeping you from advertising a more specific route (i.e /25's)?
Most large transits and NSPs filter out prefixes more specific than a /24. Conventionally, at least in my experience, /24's are the most-specific prefix you can use and expect that it will end up in most places. Some shops with limited router processing or table storage capacity will filter even more restrictively, so a bigger aggregate is worth announcing as well. Cheers, jof
Current thread:
- Hijacked Network Ranges Kelvin Williams (Jan 31)
- Re: Hijacked Network Ranges Grant Ridder (Jan 31)
- Re: Hijacked Network Ranges Justin M. Streiner (Jan 31)
- Re: Hijacked Network Ranges Keegan Holley (Jan 31)
- Re: Hijacked Network Ranges PC (Jan 31)
- Re: Hijacked Network Ranges Kelvin Williams (Jan 31)
- Re: Hijacked Network Ranges Tony McCrory (Jan 31)
- Re: Hijacked Network Ranges Anurag Bhatia (Jan 31)
- Re: Hijacked Network Ranges Justin M. Streiner (Jan 31)
- Re: Hijacked Network Ranges Jonathan Lassoff (Jan 31)
- Re: Hijacked Network Ranges Grant Ridder (Jan 31)
- Re: Hijacked Network Ranges Keegan Holley (Jan 31)
- Re: Hijacked Network Ranges Jonathan Lassoff (Jan 31)
- RE: Hijacked Network Ranges Chuck Church (Jan 31)
- Re: Hijacked Network Ranges Kelvin Williams (Jan 31)
- Re: Hijacked Network Ranges Ricky Beam (Jan 31)
- RE: Hijacked Network Ranges - paging Cogent and GBLX/L3 Schiller, Heather A (Jan 31)
- Re: Hijacked Network Ranges - paging Cogent and GBLX/L3 Keegan Holley (Jan 31)
- RE: Hijacked Network Ranges - paging Cogent and GBLX/L3 Schiller, Heather A (Jan 31)
- RE: Hijacked Network Ranges - paging Cogent and GBLX/L3 Schiller, Heather A (Jan 31)
- RE: Hijacked Network Ranges - paging Cogent and GBLX/L3 Ido Szargel (Jan 31)
- Re: Hijacked Network Ranges - paging Cogent and GBLX/L3 Keegan Holley (Jan 31)