nanog mailing list archives
Re: Megaupload.com seized
From: "Ricky Beam" <jfbeam () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 14:11:04 -0500
On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 22:34:33 -0500, Michael Painter <tvhawaii () shaka com> wrote:
I quickly read through the indictment, but the gov't claims that when given a takedown notice, MU would only remove the *link* and not the file itself.
That's actually a standard practice. It allows the uploader to file a counterclaim and have the content restored. One cannot "restore" what has already been deleted.
However, never going back and cleaning up the undisputed content is a whole other mess of dead monkeys.
Current thread:
- "Illegal content" (Re: Megaupload.com seized), (continued)
- "Illegal content" (Re: Megaupload.com seized) Carsten Bormann (Jan 20)
- Re: "Illegal content" (Re: Megaupload.com seized) Marshall Eubanks (Jan 20)
- Re: "Illegal content" (Re: Megaupload.com seized) Robert Bonomi (Jan 20)
- Re: "Illegal content" (Re: Megaupload.com seized) Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 20)
- Re: Megaupload.com seized Owen DeLong (Jan 20)
- Re: Megaupload.com seized bmanning (Jan 20)
- Re: Megaupload.com seized Vadim Antonov (Jan 20)
- Re: Megaupload.com seized Jay Ashworth (Jan 20)
- Re: Megaupload.com seized Jeroen van Aart (Jan 31)
- Re: Megaupload.com seized Michael Painter (Jan 19)
- Re: Megaupload.com seized Ricky Beam (Jan 20)
- Re: Megaupload.com seized Paul Graydon (Jan 20)
- Re: Megaupload.com seized Tony McCrory (Jan 20)
- Re: Megaupload.com seized Leo Bicknell (Jan 20)
- Re: Megaupload.com seized Roland Perry (Jan 20)
- Re: Megaupload.com seized Marshall Eubanks (Jan 20)
- Re: Megaupload.com seized Administrator (Jan 20)
- Re: Megaupload.com seized Ricky Beam (Jan 20)
- Re: Megaupload.com seized Jay Ashworth (Jan 20)
- Re: Megaupload.com seized Joly MacFie (Jan 20)
- Re: Megaupload.com seized Jay Ashworth (Jan 21)