nanog mailing list archives

Re: Megaupload.com seized


From: bmanning () vacation karoshi com
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 11:17:50 +0000

On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 03:05:47AM -0800, Owen DeLong wrote:

On Jan 20, 2012, at 2:25 AM, Robert Bonomi wrote:


Mark Andrews <marka () isc org> wrote:

I suspect most file sharing site don't have illegal content.  Most
would have some content that is there without the permission of the
copyright holder.  These are different things.

<nitpick>
 "Without the permission of the copyright holder" _is_ contrary to
 statute, and thus 'against the law'.  As such 'illegal' is _not_
 an incorrect term to apply to the situation.

 It may not be a _criminal_ violation, but it is still proscribed by law.

 "Illegal" and "criminal" -- _these_ are different things.

 Junk faxing is illegal, Telemarketing calls to cell phones are illegal,
 Public distribution without the permission of the copyright owner is
 illegal.

 Except in special cases, none of those actions are _criminal_, but 
 they are all violations of law, and thus _illegal_.


Actually, they are all criminal violations. They may be infractions, or, they
may not often get prosecuted, but, each is, in fact, a criminal violation.

Owen


        depends on the jurisdiction me thinks.  Do US laws apply in India? Nigeria?
        Mars?  Your broad generlizations  may not hold.  

/bill


Current thread: