nanog mailing list archives
Re: using "reserved" IPv6 space
From: Jeroen Massar <jeroen () unfix org>
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 16:41:41 +0200
On 2012-07-13 16:38, -Hammer- wrote:
OK. I'm pretty sure I'm gonna get some flak for this but I'll share this question and it's background anyway. Please be gentle. In the past, with IPv4, we have used reserved or "non-routable" space Internally in production for segments that won't be seen anywhere else.
There is this very nice concept called ULA (RFC4193), use it. If you want to be more sure about uniqueness, use http://www.sixxs.net/tools/grh/ula/ or you can also just use a chunk of your 'global' prefix and don't announce a route for it and firewall it off properly. Greets, Jeroen
Current thread:
- using "reserved" IPv6 space -Hammer- (Jul 13)
- Re: using "reserved" IPv6 space Jeroen Massar (Jul 13)
- Re: using "reserved" IPv6 space -Hammer- (Jul 13)
- RE: using "reserved" IPv6 space Leo Vegoda (Jul 13)
- Re: using "reserved" IPv6 space TJ (Jul 13)
- Re: using "reserved" IPv6 space -Hammer- (Jul 13)
- Re: using "reserved" IPv6 space Randy Bush (Jul 13)
- Re: using "reserved" IPv6 space Owen DeLong (Jul 13)
- Re: using "reserved" IPv6 space Brandon Ross (Jul 13)
- Re: using "reserved" IPv6 space joseph . snyder (Jul 14)
- Re: using "reserved" IPv6 space -Hammer- (Jul 14)
- Re: using "reserved" IPv6 space Owen DeLong (Jul 14)
- Re: using "reserved" IPv6 space -Hammer- (Jul 13)
- Re: using "reserved" IPv6 space Jeroen Massar (Jul 13)