nanog mailing list archives
Re: using "reserved" IPv6 space
From: bmanning () vacation karoshi com
Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2012 07:58:44 +0000
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 09:50:39AM +0200, Laurent GUERBY wrote:
Sorry if I wasn't clear in my first message. Is there an agreed upon definition of "end site"? Sincerely, Laurent
this might help. seems like these folks have general agreement on terms. NANOG-critters might have different points of view. http://www.cio.gov/documents/2012_IPv6_Roadmap_FINAL_20120712.pdf /bill
Current thread:
- Re: using "reserved" IPv6 space, (continued)
- Re: using "reserved" IPv6 space Jean-Francois . TremblayING (Jul 13)
- Re: using "reserved" IPv6 space Jeroen Massar (Jul 13)
- Re: using "reserved" IPv6 space Fred Baker (fred) (Jul 16)
- Re: using "reserved" IPv6 space Skeeve Stevens (Jul 13)
- Re: using "reserved" IPv6 space Jérôme Nicolle (Jul 14)
- Re: using "reserved" IPv6 space Owen DeLong (Jul 14)
- Re: using "reserved" IPv6 space Oliver (Jul 14)
- Re: using "reserved" IPv6 space Laurent GUERBY (Jul 14)
- Re: using "reserved" IPv6 space Owen DeLong (Jul 14)
- Re: using "reserved" IPv6 space Laurent GUERBY (Jul 15)
- Re: using "reserved" IPv6 space bmanning (Jul 15)
- Re: using "reserved" IPv6 space Owen DeLong (Jul 15)
- Re: using "reserved" IPv6 space Owen DeLong (Jul 14)
- Re: using "reserved" IPv6 space Jeroen Massar (Jul 17)
- Re: using "reserved" IPv6 space Seth Mattinen (Jul 17)
- Re: using "reserved" IPv6 space Jeroen Massar (Jul 17)
- Re: using "reserved" IPv6 space Jeroen Massar (Jul 17)
- Re: using "reserved" IPv6 space Seth Mattinen (Jul 17)