nanog mailing list archives
Re: using "reserved" IPv6 space
From: Seth Mattinen <sethm () rollernet us>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 16:36:54 -0700
On 7/17/12 3:57 PM, Jeroen Massar wrote:
I am wondering what you meaning with 'squat', note that what I reference above is real full RFC4193 calculated ULA.
By "squat" I meant take a random chunk of IPv6 space and use it as "private" address space. He said: On 7/13/12 7:38 AM, -Hammer- wrote:
I was considering taking the same approach. Maybe using 0100::/8 or 1000::/4 or A000::/3 as a space for this.
And I would say no, use ULA space instead since it's set aside for such things. ~Seth
Current thread:
- Re: using "reserved" IPv6 space, (continued)
- Re: using "reserved" IPv6 space Laurent GUERBY (Jul 14)
- Re: using "reserved" IPv6 space Owen DeLong (Jul 14)
- Re: using "reserved" IPv6 space Laurent GUERBY (Jul 15)
- Re: using "reserved" IPv6 space bmanning (Jul 15)
- Re: using "reserved" IPv6 space Owen DeLong (Jul 15)
- Re: using "reserved" IPv6 space Jeroen Massar (Jul 17)
- Re: using "reserved" IPv6 space Seth Mattinen (Jul 17)
- Re: using "reserved" IPv6 space Jeroen Massar (Jul 17)
- Re: using "reserved" IPv6 space Jeroen Massar (Jul 17)
- Re: using "reserved" IPv6 space Seth Mattinen (Jul 17)