nanog mailing list archives
Re: did AS174 and AS4134 de-peer?
From: Greg Chalmers <gchalmers () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2012 09:55:29 +1100
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 9:34 AM, Jim Cowie <cowie () renesys com> wrote:
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 2:23 AM, John van Oppen <jvanoppen () spectrumnet uswrote:All - I was noticing that it appears from our Seattle-based full route feedfromcogent that they may have de-peered AS4134 (or vise-versa)... anyoneknowanything about this? We noticed this recently in a shift of trafficawayfrom cogent for traffic to and from china telecom... Now cogent's pathis_174_1239_4134_.Indeed: http://www.renesys.com/blog/2012/03/cogent-depeers-china-telecom.shtml cheers, --jim
Isn't this journalism a bit yellow? No facts / based on speculation.. - Greg
Current thread:
- did AS174 and AS4134 de-peer? John van Oppen (Mar 06)
- Re: did AS174 and AS4134 de-peer? Jim Cowie (Mar 07)
- Re: did AS174 and AS4134 de-peer? Greg Chalmers (Mar 07)
- Re: did AS174 and AS4134 de-peer? Darius Jahandarie (Mar 07)
- Re: did AS174 and AS4134 de-peer? Nick Hilliard (Mar 07)
- Re: did AS174 and AS4134 de-peer? Patrick W. Gilmore (Mar 07)
- Re: did AS174 and AS4134 de-peer? Jim Cowie (Mar 07)
- Re: did AS174 and AS4134 de-peer? Patrick W. Gilmore (Mar 07)
- Re: did AS174 and AS4134 de-peer? Michael Sinatra (Mar 07)
- Re: did AS174 and AS4134 de-peer? Eric (Mar 08)
- Re: did AS174 and AS4134 de-peer? Greg Chalmers (Mar 07)
- Re: did AS174 and AS4134 de-peer? Jim Cowie (Mar 07)