nanog mailing list archives
Re: did AS174 and AS4134 de-peer?
From: Darius Jahandarie <djahandarie () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2012 18:19:25 -0500
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 17:55, Greg Chalmers <gchalmers () gmail com> wrote:
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 9:34 AM, Jim Cowie <cowie () renesys com> wrote:http://www.renesys.com/blog/2012/03/cogent-depeers-china-telecom.shtml cheers, --jimIsn't this journalism a bit yellow? No facts / based on speculation.. - Greg
Now all they need to do is link back to this NANOG thread as a source. -- Darius Jahandarie
Current thread:
- did AS174 and AS4134 de-peer? John van Oppen (Mar 06)
- Re: did AS174 and AS4134 de-peer? Jim Cowie (Mar 07)
- Re: did AS174 and AS4134 de-peer? Greg Chalmers (Mar 07)
- Re: did AS174 and AS4134 de-peer? Darius Jahandarie (Mar 07)
- Re: did AS174 and AS4134 de-peer? Nick Hilliard (Mar 07)
- Re: did AS174 and AS4134 de-peer? Patrick W. Gilmore (Mar 07)
- Re: did AS174 and AS4134 de-peer? Jim Cowie (Mar 07)
- Re: did AS174 and AS4134 de-peer? Patrick W. Gilmore (Mar 07)
- Re: did AS174 and AS4134 de-peer? Michael Sinatra (Mar 07)
- Re: did AS174 and AS4134 de-peer? Eric (Mar 08)
- Re: did AS174 and AS4134 de-peer? Greg Chalmers (Mar 07)
- Re: did AS174 and AS4134 de-peer? Jim Cowie (Mar 07)