nanog mailing list archives
Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
From: Doug Barton <dougb () dougbarton us>
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 17:42:02 -0700
On 3/11/2012 3:15 PM, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
But ARIN's action meant it never had a chance. I really don't get why they felt the need to start allowing IPv6 PI after a decade
Because as far back as 2003 ARIN members (and members from all the other RIRs for that matter) were saying in very clear terms that PI space was a requirement for moving to v6. No one wanted to lose the provider independence that they had gained with v4. Without that, v6 was a total non-starter. ARIN was simply listening to its members. Doug -- If you're never wrong, you're not trying hard enough
Current thread:
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary, (continued)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Jimmy Hess (Mar 09)
- RE: filtering /48 is going to be necessary George Bonser (Mar 09)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Sascha Lenz (Mar 10)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Owen DeLong (Mar 09)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Owen DeLong (Mar 09)
- RE: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Leo Vegoda (Mar 09)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Mukom Akong T. (Mar 11)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mar 11)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Joel jaeggli (Mar 11)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mar 11)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Doug Barton (Mar 11)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Robert E. Seastrom (Mar 12)
- RE: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Leigh Porter (Mar 12)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mar 12)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Owen DeLong (Mar 12)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Joel jaeggli (Mar 18)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Joel jaeggli (Mar 11)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Seth Mos (Mar 12)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Owen DeLong (Mar 12)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Seth Mos (Mar 12)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Owen DeLong (Mar 12)
- Message not available
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Tim Chown (Mar 12)