nanog mailing list archives
Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 10:09:20 -0700
On Mar 12, 2012, at 8:23 AM, Seth Mos wrote:
On 12-3-2012 16:07, Robert E. Seastrom wrote:Doug Barton <dougb () dougbarton us> writes:Grass-roots, bottom-up policy process + Need for multihoming + Got tired of waiting = IPv6 PI+ Cheap End Users = IPv6 NPt (IPv6 Prefix Translation) Cheers, Seth
I don't get the association between cheap end users and NPT. Can you explain how one relates to the other, given the added costs of unnecessarily translating prefixes? Owen
Current thread:
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary, (continued)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mar 11)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Joel jaeggli (Mar 11)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mar 11)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Doug Barton (Mar 11)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Robert E. Seastrom (Mar 12)
- RE: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Leigh Porter (Mar 12)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mar 12)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Owen DeLong (Mar 12)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Joel jaeggli (Mar 18)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Joel jaeggli (Mar 11)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Seth Mos (Mar 12)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Owen DeLong (Mar 12)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Seth Mos (Mar 12)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Owen DeLong (Mar 12)
- Message not available
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Tim Chown (Mar 12)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Owen DeLong (Mar 12)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary William Herrin (Mar 12)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mar 12)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Ćukasz Bromirski (Mar 12)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary William Herrin (Mar 12)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Geoff Huston (Mar 12)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary William Herrin (Mar 12)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mar 11)