nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth
From: Darius Jahandarie <djahandarie () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 09:04:59 -0400
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 8:55 AM, Marshall Eubanks <marshall.eubanks () gmail com> wrote:
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 12:46 AM, PC <paul4004 () gmail com> wrote:While there may be other grounds for telling them not to call you, the do not call list is not one of them as it does not apply to business to business solicitations. "The national Do-Not-Call list protects home voice or personal wireless phone numbers only. While you may be able to register a business number, your registration will not make telephone solicitations to that number unlawful." http://www.fcc.gov/guides/unwanted-telephone-marketing-callsAlso, (from http://www.fcc.gov/encyclopedia/do-not-call-list ) The Do-Not-Call registry does not prevent all unwanted calls. It does not cover the following: calls from organizations with which you have established a business relationship; And, in this case, there is a previously established business relationship.
"Because of limitations in the jurisdiction of the FTC and FCC, calls from or on behalf of political organizations, charities, and telephone surveyors would still be permitted, as would calls from companies with which you have an existing business relationship, or those to whom you’ve provided express agreement in writing to receive their calls. However, if you ask a company with which you have an existing business relationship to place your number on its own do-not-call list, it must honor your request." [1] Which seems to suggest to me, if you tell them to not call you again, they need to stop. However, I was not aware of the complications of using a business number instead of a personal number. [1] http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/edu/pubs/consumer/alerts/alt107.shtm -- Darius Jahandarie
Current thread:
- Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth, (continued)
- Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth Faisal Imtiaz (May 15)
- Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth Jason Baugher (May 15)
- Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth Ren Provo (May 15)
- Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth Anurag Bhatia (May 15)
- Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth Tim Vollebregt (May 15)
- RE: Cogent for ISP bandwidth John van Oppen (May 15)
- RE: Cogent for ISP bandwidth Paul Stewart (May 16)
- Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth Darius Jahandarie (May 16)
- Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth PC (May 16)
- Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth Marshall Eubanks (May 17)
- Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth Darius Jahandarie (May 17)
- Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth Robert Bonomi (May 17)
- Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth Darius Jahandarie (May 17)
- Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth Mark Andrews (May 17)
- Re: bgp.he.net (was: Cogent for ISP bandwidth) Rob Mosher (May 15)
- Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth Jeroen van Aart (May 16)
- Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth A. Pishdadi (May 15)
- Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth Peter Kristolaitis (May 15)
- Message not available
- Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth A. Pishdadi (May 15)