nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth
From: Mark Andrews <marka () isc org>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 10:01:47 +1000
In message <CAFANWtUrROGJZF0fFAZhs8QOnZQ2W4H7DqWDCwA+pUMnqCi1KQ () mail gmail com> , Darius Jahandarie writes:
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Robert Bonomi <bonomi () mail r-bonomi com> wrote:Marshall Eubanks <marshall.eubanks () gmail com> wrote:On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 12:46 AM, PC <paul4004 () gmail com> wrote:While there may be other grounds for telling them not to call you, the do not call list is not one of them as it does not apply to business to business solicitations. "The national Do-Not-Call list protects home voice or personal wireless phone numbers only. While you may be able to register a business number, your registration will not make telephone solicitations to that number unlawful." http://www.fcc.gov/guides/unwanted-telephone-marketing-callsAlso, (from http://www.fcc.gov/encyclopedia/do-not-call-list ) The Do-Not-Call registry does not prevent all unwanted calls. It does not cover the following: =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0calls from organizations with which you have establi=shed abusiness relationship; And, in this case, there is a previously established =C2=A0business rela=tionship.a) The "previously established business relationship" exemption expires 6 =C2=A0 months after the 'business relationship' ends. (This is in the 'fi=ne=C2=A0 print' of the actual rules0 =C2=A0As the relationship in question =ended=C2=A0 several years ago, according to the prior poster, this exemption w=ould=C2=A0 not apply. b) Nothing in the Do-not-call rules applies to calls to business numbers. =C2=A0 Callers to business numbers are not even required to respect a 'pu=t me=C2=A0 on your "do-not-call" list', or 'do not call me again' request und=er=C2=A0 the DNC rules.So the moral of the story is to make sure you always make your Cogent calls from your home phone? :-) --=20 Darius Jahandarie
I suspect you could just sue them for harassment if they fail to honour a request to stop calling you. do-not-call lists cover home phones, in part, as governments, world wide, recognise that individuals are not in the position to sue every company that fails to honour requests to cease and desist. Company to company battles are more even and many companies have a existing relationship with lawyers as it is needed for other reasons. There are laws in most countries that will stop this harassment. You just need to pick the right one for the circumstances. Mark -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka () isc org
Current thread:
- Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth, (continued)
- Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth Anurag Bhatia (May 15)
- Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth Tim Vollebregt (May 15)
- RE: Cogent for ISP bandwidth John van Oppen (May 15)
- RE: Cogent for ISP bandwidth Paul Stewart (May 16)
- Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth Darius Jahandarie (May 16)
- Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth PC (May 16)
- Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth Marshall Eubanks (May 17)
- Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth Darius Jahandarie (May 17)
- Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth Robert Bonomi (May 17)
- Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth Darius Jahandarie (May 17)
- Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth Mark Andrews (May 17)
- Re: bgp.he.net (was: Cogent for ISP bandwidth) Rob Mosher (May 15)
- Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth Jeroen van Aart (May 16)
- Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth A. Pishdadi (May 15)
- Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth Peter Kristolaitis (May 15)
- Message not available
- Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth A. Pishdadi (May 15)
- RE: Cogent for ISP bandwidth Frank Bulk (May 15)