nanog mailing list archives
Re: DNS anycasting - multiple DNS servers on same subnet Vs registrar/registry policies
From: David Conrad <drc () virtualized org>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 07:17:20 -0700
Jimmy, On May 28, 2012, at 9:58 PM, Jimmy Hess wrote:
The purpose of using a registrar is to establish DNS delegation, not to validate your site's redundancy meets the absolute best possible practices for fault tolerance.
Terminology nit: the purpose of a registrar is to allow folks the freedom to choose the service level/price that meets their needs. I assume you mean 'registry'.
It's not appropriately so for a registrar to say anything your choice; thats your network not theirs.
An alternative viewpoint is that the parent zone is responsible for the child zone, thus the parent registry can impose what they feel are appropriate requirements to ensure the zones within that registry are maintained correctly. If you do not agree with these requirements, there are now over 200 other registries to choose from (and soon to be many, many more). Regards, -drc
Current thread:
- DNS anycasting - multiple DNS servers on same subnet Vs registrar/registry policies Anurag Bhatia (May 28)
- Re: DNS anycasting - multiple DNS servers on same subnet Vs registrar/registry policies David Conrad (May 28)
- Re: DNS anycasting - multiple DNS servers on same subnet Vs registrar/registry policies Jimmy Hess (May 28)
- Re: DNS anycasting - multiple DNS servers on same subnet Vs registrar/registry policies Randy Bush (May 28)
- Re: DNS anycasting - multiple DNS servers on same subnet Vs registrar/registry policies David Conrad (May 29)
- Re: DNS anycasting - multiple DNS servers on same subnet Vs registrar/registry policies Jimmy Hess (May 28)
- Re: DNS anycasting - multiple DNS servers on same subnet Vs registrar/registry policies Tony Finch (May 28)
- Re: DNS anycasting - multiple DNS servers on same subnet Vs registrar/registry policies Anurag Bhatia (May 28)
- Re: DNS anycasting - multiple DNS servers on same subnet Vs registrar/registry policies Patrick W. Gilmore (May 28)
- Re: DNS anycasting - multiple DNS servers on same subnet Vs registrar/registry policies Anurag Bhatia (May 28)
- Re: DNS anycasting - multiple DNS servers on same subnet Vs registrar/registry policies Randy Bush (May 28)
- Re: DNS anycasting - multiple DNS servers on same subnet Vs registrar/registry policies Anurag Bhatia (May 28)
- Re: DNS anycasting - multiple DNS servers on same subnet Vs registrar/registry policies David Conrad (May 28)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: DNS anycasting - multiple DNS servers on same subnet Vs registrar/registry policies Stephane Bortzmeyer (May 28)
- Re: DNS anycasting - multiple DNS servers on same subnet Vs registrar/registry policies Brett Frankenberger (May 28)
- Re: DNS anycasting - multiple DNS servers on same subnet Vs registrar/registry policies Mikkel Mondrup Kristensen (May 28)
- Re: DNS anycasting - multiple DNS servers on same subnet Vs registrar/registry policies Mark Andrews (May 28)
- Re: DNS anycasting - multiple DNS servers on same subnet Vs registrar/registry policies Stephane Bortzmeyer (May 29)
- Re: DNS anycasting - multiple DNS servers on same subnet Vs registrar/registry policies Brett Frankenberger (May 28)