nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 Netowrk Device Numbering BP
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 19:31:59 -0500
On Sat, 03 Nov 2012 00:44:14 -0500, Randy said:
Veering off this topic's course, Is there any issue with addresses like this ? 2001:470:1f00:1aa:abad:babe:8:beef < I have a bunch of these type 'addresses' configured for my various machines. I make it a point to come up with some sort of 'hex' speak address, what are peoples opinions on this?
Google for "microsoft hyperv hex constant". Show the results to whoever handles your PR. Follow their advice.
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 Netowrk Device Numbering BP, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 Netowrk Device Numbering BP Owen DeLong (Nov 01)
- Re: IPv6 Netowrk Device Numbering BP Miquel van Smoorenburg (Nov 01)
- Re: IPv6 Netowrk Device Numbering BP Owen DeLong (Nov 01)
- Re: IPv6 Netowrk Device Numbering BP joel jaeggli (Nov 03)
- Re: IPv6 Netowrk Device Numbering BP Randy (Nov 02)
- Re: IPv6 Netowrk Device Numbering BP Graham Beneke (Nov 02)
- Re: IPv6 Netowrk Device Numbering BP Karl Auer (Nov 02)
- Re: IPv6 Netowrk Device Numbering BP Eugeniu Patrascu (Nov 05)
- Re: IPv6 Netowrk Device Numbering BP Karl Auer (Nov 05)
- Re: IPv6 Netowrk Device Numbering BP Karl Auer (Nov 04)