nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 Netowrk Device Numbering BP
From: Randy <nanog () afxr net>
Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2012 00:44:14 -0500
Veering off this topic's course, Is there any issue with addresses like this ? 2001:470:1f00:1aa:abad:babe:8:beef < I have a bunch of these type 'addresses' configured for my various machines.
I make it a point to come up with some sort of 'hex' speak address, what are peoples opinions on this?
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 Netowrk Device Numbering BP, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 Netowrk Device Numbering BP Tore Anderson (Nov 04)
- Re: IPv6 Netowrk Device Numbering BP Fred Baker (fred) (Nov 03)
- Re: IPv6 Netowrk Device Numbering BP Miquel van Smoorenburg (Nov 01)
- Re: IPv6 Netowrk Device Numbering BP Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 01)
- Re: IPv6 Netowrk Device Numbering BP David Miller (Nov 01)
- Re: IPv6 Netowrk Device Numbering BP Owen DeLong (Nov 01)
- Re: IPv6 Netowrk Device Numbering BP Miquel van Smoorenburg (Nov 01)
- Re: IPv6 Netowrk Device Numbering BP Owen DeLong (Nov 01)
- Re: IPv6 Netowrk Device Numbering BP joel jaeggli (Nov 03)
- Re: IPv6 Netowrk Device Numbering BP Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 01)
- Re: IPv6 Netowrk Device Numbering BP Randy (Nov 02)
- Re: IPv6 Netowrk Device Numbering BP Graham Beneke (Nov 02)
- Re: IPv6 Netowrk Device Numbering BP Karl Auer (Nov 02)
- Re: IPv6 Netowrk Device Numbering BP Eugeniu Patrascu (Nov 05)
- Re: IPv6 Netowrk Device Numbering BP Karl Auer (Nov 05)
- Re: IPv6 Netowrk Device Numbering BP Karl Auer (Nov 04)