nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 Ignorance
From: Steve Meuse <smeuse () mara org>
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 10:58:40 -0400
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 9:21 AM, Robert E. Seastrom <rs () seastrom com> wrote:
What do I mean when I say "it must support IPv6"? I mean two things. First, full feature parity with IPv4. Everything that works under IPv4 must work under IPv6. If you have exceptions, you'd better document them and have a remediation plan (or work-around if it is a deficiency baked into the standard; there are a few of which I'm aware). Second, the device must function perfectly in an IPv6-only environment, with not a hint of IPv4 addressing around. Dual-stack capability is nice, but should be an easy thing to provide if you can handle the first two requirements.
Well spoken RS, I'm cutting and pasting this one to my account team(s). Far too many discussions about this with them recently. (really, you're just *now* getting v6 to work on bundled interfaces?) -Steve
Current thread:
- RE: IPv6 Ignorance, (continued)
- RE: IPv6 Ignorance Otis L. Surratt, Jr. (Sep 16)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance Masataka Ohta (Sep 16)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance Seth Mattinen (Sep 16)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance Faisal Imtiaz (Sep 16)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance Justin Wilson (Sep 16)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance Faisal Imtiaz (Sep 16)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance Tom Limoncelli (Sep 17)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance Jason Leschnik (Sep 17)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance Cameron Byrne (Sep 17)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance Mark Andrews (Sep 17)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance Robert E. Seastrom (Sep 18)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance Steve Meuse (Sep 18)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance Jared Mauch (Sep 18)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance Steve Meuse (Sep 18)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance Jared Mauch (Sep 18)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance Michael Thomas (Sep 18)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance Steve Meuse (Sep 18)
- RE: IPv6 Ignorance Otis L. Surratt, Jr. (Sep 16)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance Mark Andrews (Sep 18)