nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 Ignorance
From: Mark Andrews <marka () isc org>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 08:09:42 +1000
In message <86lig7cvpw.fsf () seastrom com>, "Robert E. Seastrom" writes:
Seth Mattinen <sethm () rollernet us> writes:I came across these threads today; the blind ignorance towards IPv6 from some of the posters is kind of shocking.There are actually a few good points mixed in there, like the guy who observes that dual stacking is of limited utility if there are no v4 addresses to be had.
Dual stack w/ CGN for IPv4. That can be supplied a number of ways and it has more limitations for IPv4 that conventional CPE based NAT. Turning on dual stack, even at this late stage, lights up IPv6, moves most of the traffic to IPv6 so that CGN's don't need to be so beefy, and doesn't mean that you have to have perfect IPv6 everywhere when you turn on IPv6. Mark -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka () isc org
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance Tom Limoncelli (Sep 17)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance Jason Leschnik (Sep 17)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance Cameron Byrne (Sep 17)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance Mark Andrews (Sep 17)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance Robert E. Seastrom (Sep 18)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance Steve Meuse (Sep 18)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance Jared Mauch (Sep 18)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance Steve Meuse (Sep 18)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance Jared Mauch (Sep 18)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance Michael Thomas (Sep 18)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance Steve Meuse (Sep 18)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance Tom Limoncelli (Sep 17)
- Re: IPv6 Ignorance Mark Andrews (Sep 18)