nanog mailing list archives

Re: Big Temporary Networks


From: William Herrin <bill () herrin us>
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 19:03:08 -0400

On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 6:14 PM, Jo Rhett <jrhett () netconsonance com> wrote:
Not being aware of which states have this law, it's entirely possible that
the intersection between states that have this law and states which have
enough scifi fans willing to get together to host a worldcon is negligible.

There were enough fans among the 600,000 folks in the Baltimore area
but not enough an hour away among the 5,600,000 in the National
Capital Region to justify hosting a Worldcon a couple miles inside the
Virginia border where no unions would get in your way? Really?


I'm closely associated and personal friends with people who have done the
hotel negotiations for four of the recent worldcons, and on a first name
basis with most of the others, and this union requirement has been a major
problem with most if not all of them.

Tell 'em to look in a right to work state. Like Florida.

http://www.nrtw.org/rtws.htm


Just getting a waiver to allow people
to serve drinks in their own hotel rooms has been hard enough to break many
bids. It is currently impossible in San Francisco due to hotel contracts,
and part of why Worldcon will never return to San Francisco unless very
unlikely changes happen.

California. NOT a right to work state.

Regards,
Bill Herrin



-- 
William D. Herrin ................ herrin () dirtside com  bill () herrin us
3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004


Current thread: