nanog mailing list archives

Re: guys != gender neutral

From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 12:29:05 +0200

"Folks"?  I really do mean "folks" when I write "guys",


<pedantry>

folk is the plural 

and, as far as the use of gender-biased terms, as someone said well the
other day, when you are in a hole, stop digging

randy

Current thread:

Re: guys != gender neutral, (continued)
- - - Re: guys != gender neutral Eric Parsonage (Sep 28)
    - Re: guys != gender neutral Jay Ashworth (Sep 28)
    - Re: guys != gender neutral Simon Perreault (Sep 28)
    - Re: guys != gender neutral Scott Noel-Hemming (Sep 28)
    - Re: guys != gender neutral Jay Ashworth (Sep 28)
    - Re: guys != gender neutral Joe Greco (Sep 28)
    - Re: guys != gender neutral Miles Fidelman (Sep 28)
    - Re: guys != gender neutral Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 28)
    - Re: guys != gender neutral Miles Fidelman (Sep 28)
    - Re: guys != gender neutral Tim Franklin (Sep 28)
    - Re: guys != gender neutral Randy Bush (Sep 28)
    - Re: guys != gender neutral Owen DeLong (Sep 28)
    - Re: guys != gender neutral Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 28)
    - RE: guys != gender neutral Otis L. Surratt, Jr. (Sep 28)
    - RE: guys != gender neutral Jamie Bowden (Sep 28)
    - Re: guys != gender neutral Jay Ashworth (Sep 28)
    - Re: guys != gender neutral Justin M. Streiner (Sep 28)
    - RE: guys != gender neutral Keith Medcalf (Sep 29)
    - Re: guys != gender neutral Owen DeLong (Sep 30)
    - Re: really nasty attacks Stephane Bortzmeyer (Sep 27)
    - Re: really nasty attacks Miguel Mata (Sep 27)

(Thread continues...)