nanog mailing list archives
Re: guys != gender neutral
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 10:38:42 -0400
On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 07:18:54 -0700, Owen DeLong said:
On Sep 28, 2012, at 3:29 AM, Randy Bush <randy () psg com> wrote:"Folks"? I really do mean "folks" when I write "guys",<pedantry> folk is the plural and, as far as the use of gender-biased terms, as someone said well the other day, when you are in a hole, stop digging randyAccording to my Dictionary, both "folk" and "folks" are acceptable plurals.
Somebody I know once described somebody else as 'pendantic'. I asked "Don't you mean pedantic?" and he replied "No, *you're* pedantic for asking. He just hangs around with nothing better to do." :)
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: guys != gender neutral, (continued)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Simon Perreault (Sep 28)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Scott Noel-Hemming (Sep 28)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Jay Ashworth (Sep 28)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Joe Greco (Sep 28)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Miles Fidelman (Sep 28)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 28)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Miles Fidelman (Sep 28)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Tim Franklin (Sep 28)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Randy Bush (Sep 28)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Owen DeLong (Sep 28)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 28)
- RE: guys != gender neutral Otis L. Surratt, Jr. (Sep 28)
- RE: guys != gender neutral Jamie Bowden (Sep 28)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Jay Ashworth (Sep 28)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Justin M. Streiner (Sep 28)
- RE: guys != gender neutral Keith Medcalf (Sep 29)
- Re: guys != gender neutral Owen DeLong (Sep 30)
- Re: really nasty attacks Stephane Bortzmeyer (Sep 27)
- Re: really nasty attacks Miguel Mata (Sep 27)
- Re: really nasty attacks Cutler James R (Sep 27)