Re: Open Resolver Problems

[Mark Andrews <marka () isc org>]

In message <CF4E9F59-4A9E-4E03-8EB4-469C3DB15FF4 () arbor net>, "Dobbins, Roland" writes:
> On Apr 2, 2013, at 7:53 AM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> >  Such lines are tantamount to extortion especially if the ISP supplies 
> commercial grade lines.
>
> Patrick's talking about consumer broadband access.  Such AUP stipulations 
> are quite common.

I know and I would still argue that they are tantamount to extortion.

> This is in no way 'tantamount to extortion'.  Folks can either accept the 
> AUP, or choose not to enter into a contract for the service in question 
> under those conditions; there is no compulsion or coercion to do so.

So the home user that want to run a server now has to pay for COLO
or pay the ISP for it commercial line that is delivered over the
same physical circuit for extra dollars which gets what?  Maybe a
upgraded SLA and maybe some static addresses.

> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Roland Dobbins <rdobbins () arbor net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com>
>
>         Luck is the residue of opportunity and design.
>
>                      -- John Milton
-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: marka () isc org