nanog mailing list archives
Re: Open Resolver Problems
From: Paul Ferguson <fergdawgster () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2013 18:52:43 -0700
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 6:45 PM, Owen DeLong <owen () delong com> wrote:
On Apr 1, 2013, at 6:38 PM, "Dobbins, Roland" <rdobbins () arbor net> wrote:On Apr 2, 2013, at 8:21 AM, Mark Andrews wrote:I know and I would still argue that they are tantamount to extortion.There is no coercion involved, so, by definition, it can't be called 'extortion'. If you don't like the AUP, don't sign up for the service - simple as that. Hyperbole isn't generally helpful.In an oligopoly situation, that's hardly a valid set of choices and is tantamount to extortion.
Yeah, I thought so, too, but apparently the FCC and the SEC hasn't seen it that way for the past 20 years. Go figure. :-) - ferg -- "Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson fergdawgster(at)gmail.com
Current thread:
- Re: Open Resolver Problems, (continued)
- Re: Open Resolver Problems Mikael Abrahamsson (Apr 01)
- Re: Open Resolver Problems Måns Nilsson (Apr 02)
- Re: Open Resolver Problems Niels Bakker (Apr 01)
- Re: Open Resolver Problems Jared Mauch (Apr 01)
- Re: Open Resolver Problems Niels Bakker (Apr 01)
- Re: Open Resolver Problems Mark Andrews (Apr 01)
- Re: Open Resolver Problems Dobbins, Roland (Apr 01)
- Re: Open Resolver Problems Mark Andrews (Apr 01)
- Re: Open Resolver Problems Dobbins, Roland (Apr 01)
- Re: Open Resolver Problems Owen DeLong (Apr 01)
- Re: Open Resolver Problems Paul Ferguson (Apr 01)
- Re: Open Resolver Problems Dobbins, Roland (Apr 01)
- Re: Open Resolver Problems Owen DeLong (Apr 01)
- Re: Open Resolver Problems Dobbins, Roland (Apr 01)
- Re: Open Resolver Problems Owen DeLong (Apr 01)
- Re: Open Resolver Problems Dobbins, Roland (Apr 01)
- Re: Open Resolver Problems Paul Ferguson (Apr 01)
- Re: Open Resolver Problems Dobbins, Roland (Apr 01)
- Re: Open Resolver Problems Dobbins, Roland (Apr 01)
- RE: Open Resolver Problems Jamie Bowden (Apr 02)