nanog mailing list archives
Re: Tier1 blackholing policy?
From: "Dobbins, Roland" <rdobbins () arbor net>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 15:17:32 +0000
On Apr 30, 2013, at 10:07 PM, Chris Boyd wrote:
3 - Deliver all packets unless I've signed up for an enhanced security offering?
Even if said packets from an obviously compromised server on a high-speed link are attack packets causing problems for the ISP itself as well as for its customers? Trust me, large transit ISPs don't *want* to be in the blackholing business. They only do so when they're forced into it by necessity (operational, legal, regulatory). Also note that in the case of the server(s) you can't access, they may well be on shared hosting with thousands of sites/accounts on a single IP, one or more of which may be compromised. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Roland Dobbins <rdobbins () arbor net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com> Luck is the residue of opportunity and design. -- John Milton
Current thread:
- Tier1 blackholing policy? Thomas Schmid (Apr 30)
- Re: Tier1 blackholing policy? ML (Apr 30)
- Re: Tier1 blackholing policy? Chris Boyd (Apr 30)
- Re: Tier1 blackholing policy? Jared Mauch (Apr 30)
- Re: Tier1 blackholing policy? Tassos Chatzithomaoglou (Apr 30)
- Re: Tier1 blackholing policy? Darius Jahandarie (Apr 30)
- Re: Tier1 blackholing policy? Jared Mauch (Apr 30)
- Message not available
- Re: Tier1 blackholing policy? Jared Mauch (Apr 30)
- Re: Tier1 blackholing policy? Chris Boyd (Apr 30)
- Re: Tier1 blackholing policy? ML (Apr 30)
- Re: Tier1 blackholing policy? Patrick W. Gilmore (Apr 30)
- Re: Tier1 blackholing policy? Dobbins, Roland (Apr 30)
- Re: Tier1 blackholing policy? Thomas Schmid (Apr 30)
- Re: Tier1 blackholing policy? Patrick W. Gilmore (Apr 30)
- Re: Tier1 blackholing policy? Thomas Schmid (Apr 30)
- Re: Tier1 blackholing policy? Patrick W. Gilmore (Apr 30)
- Re: Tier1 blackholing policy? Thomas Schmid (Apr 30)
- Re: Tier1 blackholing policy? joel jaeggli (Apr 30)