nanog mailing list archives
Re: Tier1 blackholing policy?
From: joel jaeggli <joelja () bogus com>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 09:00:08 -0700
On 4/30/13 8:23 AM, Thomas Schmid wrote:
You seem to have odd ideas about what it means to be a settlement free provider. Most of their customers are not smaller internet service providers.On 30.04.2013 17:07, Chris Boyd wrote:On Tue, 2013-04-30 at 10:59 -0400, ML wrote:1) Do nothing - They're supposed deliver any and all bits (Disregarding a DoS or similiar situation which impedes said network) 2) Prefix filter - Don't be a party (at least in one direction) to the bad actors traffic.3 - Deliver all packets unless I've signed up for an enhanced security offering?right - I see this really as something that should be decided at the edge of the internet (Tier2+) and not in the core.
Current thread:
- Re: Tier1 blackholing policy?, (continued)
- Re: Tier1 blackholing policy? Darius Jahandarie (Apr 30)
- Re: Tier1 blackholing policy? Jared Mauch (Apr 30)
- Message not available
- Re: Tier1 blackholing policy? Jared Mauch (Apr 30)
- Re: Tier1 blackholing policy? Patrick W. Gilmore (Apr 30)
- Re: Tier1 blackholing policy? Dobbins, Roland (Apr 30)
- Re: Tier1 blackholing policy? Thomas Schmid (Apr 30)
- Re: Tier1 blackholing policy? Patrick W. Gilmore (Apr 30)
- Re: Tier1 blackholing policy? Thomas Schmid (Apr 30)
- Re: Tier1 blackholing policy? Patrick W. Gilmore (Apr 30)
- Re: Tier1 blackholing policy? Thomas Schmid (Apr 30)
- Re: Tier1 blackholing policy? joel jaeggli (Apr 30)