nanog mailing list archives
Re: NYT covers China cyberthreat
From: "Scott Weeks" <surfer () mauigateway com>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 11:11:17 -0800
--- kyle.creyts () gmail com wrote: From: Kyle Creyts <kyle.creyts () gmail com> The focus on platform here is ridiculous; can someone explain how platform of attacker or target is extremely relevant? Since when did ---------------------------------------------- It implies their skillset. Here's something I just saw that says it better than I can... http://www.forbes.com/sites/andygreenberg/2013/02/21/the-shanghai-army-unit-that-hacked-115-u-s-targets-likely-wasnt-even-chinas-a-team/2/ scott
Current thread:
- Re: NYT covers China cyberthreat, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: NYT covers China cyberthreat Kyle Creyts (Feb 21)
- Re: NYT covers China cyberthreat Stephen Sprunk (Feb 21)
- Re: NYT covers China cyberthreat Miles Fidelman (Feb 21)
- Re: NYT covers China cyberthreat Jack Bates (Feb 21)
- Re: NYT covers China cyberthreat Suresh Ramasubramanian (Feb 21)
- Re: NYT covers China cyberthreat Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 21)
- Re: NYT covers China cyberthreat Michael Painter (Feb 22)