nanog mailing list archives
Re: NYT covers China cyberthreat
From: Jack Bates <jbates () brightok net>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 14:58:25 -0600
On 2/21/2013 12:17 PM, Scott Weeks wrote:
I'm not upset. I'm pointing out what Steven Bellovin said in just a few words: "This strongly suggests that it's not their A-team..."
The A-team doesn't get caught and detailed. The purpose of the other teams is to detect easy targets, handle easy jobs, and create lots of noise for the A-team to hide in. Hacking has always had a lot in common with magic. Misdirection is a useful tool.
Jack
Current thread:
- Re: NYT covers China cyberthreat, (continued)
- Re: NYT covers China cyberthreat Rich Kulawiec (Feb 21)
- RE: NYT covers China cyberthreat Naslund, Steve (Feb 21)
- Re: NYT covers China cyberthreat Rich Kulawiec (Feb 26)
- Re: NYT covers China cyberthreat Kyle Creyts (Feb 26)
- Re: NYT covers China cyberthreat Adele Thompson (Feb 26)
- Re: NYT covers China cyberthreat Kyle Creyts (Feb 21)
- Re: NYT covers China cyberthreat Stephen Sprunk (Feb 21)
- Re: NYT covers China cyberthreat Miles Fidelman (Feb 21)
- Re: NYT covers China cyberthreat Jack Bates (Feb 21)
- Re: NYT covers China cyberthreat Suresh Ramasubramanian (Feb 21)
- Re: NYT covers China cyberthreat Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 21)
- Re: NYT covers China cyberthreat Michael Painter (Feb 22)