nanog mailing list archives
Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats
From: Jeff Kell <jeff-kell () utc edu>
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2013 23:44:12 -0500
On 1/9/2013 11:41 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
$GENERATE, as someone else pointed out, solves that problem for you? (Does it scale for IPv6? I can't recall - but surely this could be scripted too.) No. A /64 has 18,446,744,073,709,551,616 addresses. Even if you had machines that supported zettabytes of data the zone would never load in human lifetimes.
Can you wildcard it? (Still an IPv6 implementation virgin, just curious :) ) Jeff
Current thread:
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats, (continued)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Dave Sparro (Jan 10)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Karl Auer (Jan 10)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jan 10)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jan 10)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Matthias Leisi (Jan 10)
- RE: [SHAME] Spam Rats Warren Bailey (Jan 09)
- RE: [SHAME] Spam Rats Otis L. Surratt, Jr. (Jan 09)
- RE: [SHAME] Spam Rats Karl Auer (Jan 09)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Mark Foster (Jan 09)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Mark Andrews (Jan 09)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Jeff Kell (Jan 09)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Mark Andrews (Jan 09)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats John Levine (Jan 09)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Mark Andrews (Jan 09)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats John R. Levine (Jan 09)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Mark Andrews (Jan 09)
- PTRs for IPv6 (was Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats) Lee Howard (Jan 10)
- RE: [SHAME] Spam Rats Karl Auer (Jan 09)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Måns Nilsson (Jan 09)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats John Levine (Jan 10)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Robert Bonomi (Jan 10)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Tony Finch (Jan 11)