nanog mailing list archives
Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats
From: Dave Sparro <dsparro () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 11:03:28 -0500
On 1/10/2013 9:53 AM, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
Unused space generally gets a $generate type generic scripted runs which could be whatever, like ip-ad-dr-ess.example.com <http://ip-ad-dr-ess.example.com>If the IP address hasn't been assigned to example.com, why would make a DNS entry that implies that it has?
Not rid unallocated space, not that there's much of it in v4
Why not?
As for v6 how popular do you see it getting for mail?
What does mail have to do with DNS policy for unassigned IP addresses?
Current thread:
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats, (continued)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Joe Provo (Jan 10)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Chris Adams (Jan 09)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jan 09)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Dave Sparro (Jan 10)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jan 10)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Jima (Jan 10)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Jared Mauch (Jan 10)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats John Levine (Jan 10)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Daniel Taylor (Jan 10)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats joel jaeggli (Jan 10)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Dave Sparro (Jan 10)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Karl Auer (Jan 10)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jan 10)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jan 10)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Matthias Leisi (Jan 10)
- RE: [SHAME] Spam Rats Karl Auer (Jan 09)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Mark Foster (Jan 09)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Mark Andrews (Jan 09)
- Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats Jeff Kell (Jan 09)