nanog mailing list archives
Re: Muni network ownership and the Fourth
From: Eric Brunner-Williams <brunner () nic-naa net>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 10:02:18 -0800
On 1/29/13 9:40 AM, William Allen Simpson wrote:
I'd like to join Jay, Scott, Leo, and presumably Dave supporting muni network ...
+1 i'm indifferent to the "public-can't" rational as munis appear to do an adequate job of water and power delivery-to-the-curb, in eugene, palo alto, san francisco, ... and the capacity of fiber obsoletes the early telephone and telegraph notion of poll space contention, a basis for an earlier "natural monopoly" theory. i'm also indifferent to the "leo-in-the-noc" rational as the separation is presently somewhat fictive and overzealous prosecutions are the norm. -e
Current thread:
- Re: Muni network ownership and the Fourth, (continued)
- Re: Muni network ownership and the Fourth Jean-Francois Mezei (Jan 29)
- Re: Muni network ownership and the Fourth Owen DeLong (Jan 29)
- Re: Muni network ownership and the Fourth Jay Ashworth (Jan 30)
- Re: Muni network ownership and the Fourth Jay Ashworth (Jan 30)
- Re: Muni network ownership and the Fourth Jean-Francois Mezei (Jan 29)
- Re: Muni network ownership and the Fourth Jay Ashworth (Jan 29)
- Re: Muni network ownership and the Fourth Jean-Francois Mezei (Jan 29)
- Re: Muni network ownership and the Fourth Eric Brunner-Williams (Jan 29)
- Re: Muni network ownership and the Fourth Jay Ashworth (Jan 29)
- Re: Muni network ownership and the Fourth William Allen Simpson (Jan 29)
- Re: Muni network ownership and the Fourth Eric Brunner-Williams (Jan 29)
- Re: Muni network ownership and the Fourth Jay Ashworth (Jan 29)
- Re: Muni network ownership and the Fourth Masatoshi Enomoto (Jan 29)
- Re: Muni network ownership and the Fourth Zachary Giles (Jan 29)
- Re: Muni network ownership and the Fourth Leo Bicknell (Jan 29)