nanog mailing list archives
Re: On topic of domains
From: Andrew Sullivan <asullivan () dyn com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 07:20:49 -0400
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 9:23 PM, Jimmy Hess <mysidia () gmail com> wrote:
Domain names can be presented with a trailing dot. A fully qualified domain always contains at least one explicit dot.
But not always at the end, which is why there's a problem. RFC1123, in my opinion, contains a remark that ought to indicate to people that the trailing dot convention isn't even universal for determining whether a name is really fully-qualified. (See section 6.1.4.3. That RFC is also, of course, how we got 3com.net as a legal name, for prior to 1123 "3com" wasn't a valid label anywhere.) Best, A
Current thread:
- On topic of domains Jon Mitchell (Jul 11)
- Re: On topic of domains Tony McCrory (Jul 11)
- Re: On topic of domains Chris Hills (Jul 11)
- Re: On topic of domains Andrew Sullivan (Jul 11)
- Re: On topic of domains Guillaume Parent (Jul 11)
- Re: On topic of domains Mark Andrews (Jul 11)
- Re: On topic of domains Geoffrey Keating (Jul 11)
- Re: On topic of dotless domains Doug Barton (Jul 11)
- Re: On topic of domains bmanning (Jul 11)
- Message not available
- Re: On topic of domains Jimmy Hess (Jul 11)
- Re: On topic of domains Andrew Sullivan (Jul 12)
- Re: On topic of domains Larry Sheldon (Jul 11)