nanog mailing list archives
Re: .nyc - here we go...
From: Paul Ferguson <fergdawgster () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2013 20:47:08 -0700
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 8:41 PM, Rubens Kuhl <rubensk () gmail com> wrote:
From http://www.icann.org/en/groups/board/documents/resolutions-new-gtld-annex-ii-agenda-2b-25jun13-en.pdf "Registry Operator will periodically conduct a technical analysis to assess whether domains in the TLD are being used to perpetrate security threats, such as pharming, phishing, malware, and botnets. Registry Operator will maintain statistical reports on the number of security threats identified and the actions taken as a result of the periodic security checks. Registry Operator will maintain these reports for the term of the Agreement unless a shorter period is required by law or approved by ICANN, and will provide them to ICANN upon request."
Great, Let's see what happens. If history is any teacher... - ferg -- "Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson fergdawgster(at)gmail.com
Current thread:
- Re: .nyc - here we go..., (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: .nyc - here we go... Larry Sheldon (Jul 04)
- Re: .nyc - here we go... Eric Brunner-Williams (Jul 04)
- Re: .nyc - here we go... Eric Brunner-Williams (Jul 04)
- Re: .nyc - here we go... Matthew Kaufman (Jul 04)
- Re: .nyc - here we go... Mark Andrews (Jul 04)
- Re: .nyc - here we go... John Levine (Jul 04)
- Re: .nyc - here we go... Rubens Kuhl (Jul 02)
- Re: .nyc - here we go... Paul Ferguson (Jul 02)
- Re: .nyc - here we go... Rubens Kuhl (Jul 02)
- Re: .nyc - here we go... Paul Ferguson (Jul 02)
- Re: .nyc - here we go... Rubens Kuhl (Jul 02)
- Re: .nyc - here we go... Paul Ferguson (Jul 02)