nanog mailing list archives

Re: .nyc - here we go...

From: Paul Ferguson <fergdawgster () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2013 21:29:02 -0700

Now you are thinking. :-)

- ferg


On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 9:15 PM, Larry Sheldon <LarrySheldon () cox net> wrote:

Makes me wonder if concern for routing table size is worrying about the
right thing.



--
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
 fergdawgster(at)gmail.com

Current thread:

Re: .nyc - here we go..., (continued)
- - - Re: .nyc - here we go... Mark Andrews (Jul 04)
    - Re: .nyc - here we go... John Levine (Jul 04)
- Re: .nyc - here we go... Scott Weeks (Jul 02)
  - Re: .nyc - here we go... Rubens Kuhl (Jul 02)
    - Re: .nyc - here we go... Paul Ferguson (Jul 02)
    - Re: .nyc - here we go... Rubens Kuhl (Jul 02)
    - Re: .nyc - here we go... Paul Ferguson (Jul 02)
    - Re: .nyc - here we go... Rubens Kuhl (Jul 02)
    - Re: .nyc - here we go... Paul Ferguson (Jul 02)
    - Message not available
    - Re: .nyc - here we go... Larry Sheldon (Jul 02)
    - Re: .nyc - here we go... Paul Ferguson (Jul 02)
    - Re: .nyc - here we go... Andrew Sullivan (Jul 02)
    - Re: .nyc - here we go... Paul Ferguson (Jul 02)
    - Re: .nyc - here we go... Kyle Creyts (Jul 03)
    - Re: .nyc - here we go... Joe Abley (Jul 04)
    - Message not available
    - Re: .nyc - here we go... Larry Sheldon (Jul 02)
    - Re: .nyc - here we go... Mark Andrews (Jul 02)
- Re: .nyc - here we go... Scott Weeks (Jul 02)
  - Re: .nyc - here we go... Paul Ferguson (Jul 02)
  - Re: .nyc - here we go... John Levine (Jul 02)
- Re: .nyc - here we go... Scott Weeks (Jul 03)