nanog mailing list archives
Re: [c-nsp] DNS amplification
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta () necom830 hpcl titech ac jp>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 14:01:34 +0900
Arturo Servin wrote:
Yes, BCP38 is the solution.
It is not a solution at all, because it, instead, will promote multihomed sites bloats the global routing table. To really solve the problem in an end to end fashion, it is necessary to require IGPs carry information for the proper source address corresponding to each routing table entry in a *FULL* routing table, which must be delivered to almost, if not all, all the end systems. Masataka Ohta
Current thread:
- Re: [c-nsp] DNS amplification, (continued)
- Re: [c-nsp] DNS amplification Steven Fischer (Mar 16)
- Re: [c-nsp] DNS amplification Arturo Servin (Mar 17)
- Re: [c-nsp] DNS amplification Christopher Morrow (Mar 17)
- Re: [c-nsp] DNS amplification Arturo Servin (Mar 17)
- Re: [c-nsp] DNS amplification Christopher Morrow (Mar 17)
- Re: [c-nsp] DNS amplification Jared Mauch (Mar 18)
- Re: [c-nsp] DNS amplification Christopher Morrow (Mar 17)
- Re: [c-nsp] DNS amplification Jon Lewis (Mar 17)
- Re: [c-nsp] DNS amplification Jimmy Hess (Mar 17)
- Re: [c-nsp] DNS amplification Damian Menscher (Mar 17)
- Re: [c-nsp] DNS amplification Jimmy Hess (Mar 17)
- Re: [c-nsp] DNS amplification Mark Andrews (Mar 17)
- Re: [c-nsp] DNS amplification Masataka Ohta (Mar 17)
- Re: [c-nsp] DNS amplification Dobbins, Roland (Mar 17)
- Re: [c-nsp] DNS amplification Masataka Ohta (Mar 18)
- Re: [c-nsp] DNS amplification Dobbins, Roland (Mar 18)
- Re: [c-nsp] DNS amplification Masataka Ohta (Mar 18)
- Re: [c-nsp] DNS amplification Aled Morris (Mar 19)
- Re: [c-nsp] DNS amplification Christopher Morrow (Mar 19)
- Re: [c-nsp] DNS amplification David Conrad (Mar 19)
- Re: [c-nsp] DNS amplification Christopher Morrow (Mar 19)