nanog mailing list archives
Re: routing table go boom
From: Mike <mike-nanog () tiedyenetworks com>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 10:30:36 -0700
I appreciate everyones comments on this issue but I think you nay-sayers are going to lose. I think the future of the internet is distributed routing where the end points ultimately decide how their packets flow. I think joe 6-pack should in fact be able to be connected to as many providers as he wants, should be able to specify any mixture of connections from consumer dsl to carrier ethernet or beyond, and have the same level of service as multi-homed bgp speaking networks do today in terms of route diversity, fail-over and 'portability' (in terms of bringing your netblocks to another provider). Not a troll, just looking at the future here. Mike-
Current thread:
- Re: routing table go boom, (continued)
- Re: routing table go boom Masataka Ohta (Mar 19)
- Re: routing table go boom Dobbins, Roland (Mar 19)
- Re: routing table go boom Masataka Ohta (Mar 19)
- Re: routing table go boom Dobbins, Roland (Mar 19)
- Re: routing table go boom Masataka Ohta (Mar 19)
- Re: routing table go boom Dobbins, Roland (Mar 19)
- Re: routing table go boom Masataka Ohta (Mar 19)
- Re: routing table go boom William Herrin (Mar 19)
- Re: routing table go boom Masataka Ohta (Mar 20)
- Re: routing table go boom Sander Steffann (Mar 20)
- Re: routing table go boom Mike (Mar 20)
- Re: routing table go boom Matthew Walster (Mar 20)
- Re: routing table go boom Jared Mauch (Mar 20)
- Re: routing table go boom Jared Mauch (Mar 20)
- Re: routing table go boom Randy Bush (Mar 21)
- Re: routing table go boom Brielle Bruns (Mar 20)
- Re: routing table go boom Masataka Ohta (Mar 20)
- Re: routing table go boom William Herrin (Mar 20)
- Re: routing table go boom Masataka Ohta (Mar 20)
- Re: routing table go boom Luigi Iannone (Mar 20)
- Re: routing table go boom Luigi Iannone (Mar 20)