nanog mailing list archives
Re: ISIS and OSPF together
From: Måns Nilsson <mansaxel () besserwisser org>
Date: Sun, 12 May 2013 19:49:46 +0200
Subject: ISIS and OSPF together Date: Sun, May 12, 2013 at 02:11:37PM +0530 Quoting Glen Kent (glen.kent () gmail com):
Hi, I would like to understand the scenarios wherein the service provider/network admin might run both ISIS and OSPF together inside their network. Is this something that really happens out there?
Indeed; one of the more sane situations might be to have say anycast name servers or full-service resolvers in the network and having them talk OSPF to the first hop router. ISIS daemons on PC operating systems are scarce, working ones hardly exist. It is clear, though, that the path forward is ISIS; most people I've spoken to roll it out (in greenfield/forklift situations) or migrate to it. -- Måns Nilsson primary/secondary/besserwisser/machina MN-1334-RIPE +46 705 989668 I always have fun because I'm out of my mind!!!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Current thread:
- ISIS and OSPF together Glen Kent (May 12)
- Re: ISIS and OSPF together Peter Ehiwe (May 12)
- Re: ISIS and OSPF together Mikael Abrahamsson (May 12)
- Re: ISIS and OSPF together Randy Bush (May 12)
- Re: ISIS and OSPF together vijay gill (May 19)
- Re: ISIS and OSPF together Victor Kuarsingh (May 12)
- Re: ISIS and OSPF together Glen Kent (May 12)
- Re: ISIS and OSPF together Scott Morris (May 12)
- Re: ISIS and OSPF together Victor Kuarsingh (May 12)
- Re: ISIS and OSPF together Randy Bush (May 13)
- Re: ISIS and OSPF together Glen Kent (May 12)
- Re: ISIS and OSPF together Måns Nilsson (May 12)
- Re: ISIS and OSPF together Jen Linkova (May 15)
- Re: ISIS and OSPF together Jayram Deshpande (May 15)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: ISIS and OSPF together Brandon Butterworth (May 19)