nanog mailing list archives
Re: ISIS and OSPF together
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 10:31:18 +0100
Folks could, at least theoretically, use ISIS or OSPF multi instance/multi topology extensions to support IPv4 and IPv6 topologies. This way they would only need to run a single protocol and thereby requiring expertise in handling only one protocol.
and, as is-is supports 4 and 6, why do you use ospf in this scenario? randy
Current thread:
- ISIS and OSPF together Glen Kent (May 12)
- Re: ISIS and OSPF together Peter Ehiwe (May 12)
- Re: ISIS and OSPF together Mikael Abrahamsson (May 12)
- Re: ISIS and OSPF together Randy Bush (May 12)
- Re: ISIS and OSPF together vijay gill (May 19)
- Re: ISIS and OSPF together Victor Kuarsingh (May 12)
- Re: ISIS and OSPF together Glen Kent (May 12)
- Re: ISIS and OSPF together Scott Morris (May 12)
- Re: ISIS and OSPF together Victor Kuarsingh (May 12)
- Re: ISIS and OSPF together Randy Bush (May 13)
- Re: ISIS and OSPF together Glen Kent (May 12)
- Re: ISIS and OSPF together Måns Nilsson (May 12)
- Re: ISIS and OSPF together Jen Linkova (May 15)
- Re: ISIS and OSPF together Jayram Deshpande (May 15)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: ISIS and OSPF together Brandon Butterworth (May 19)