nanog mailing list archives
Re: Pad 1310nm cross-connects?
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike () swm pp se>
Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2013 07:06:31 +0200 (CEST)
On Sat, 19 Oct 2013, Chris Costa wrote:
median RX range to avoid potential receiver burnout over time, or just leave it un-padded?
By "padding", you mean "insert attenuator"?I have run networks with thousands of 10km optical links (1GBASE-LX, 10GBASE-LR) and none of them have used attenuators for these kinds of links, not even with 1m cable.
The discussion has been had here before, some attenuate, some don't. There is no consensus.
-- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike () swm pp se
Current thread:
- Pad 1310nm cross-connects? Chris Costa (Oct 19)
- Re: Pad 1310nm cross-connects? Mikael Abrahamsson (Oct 19)
- Re: Pad 1310nm cross-connects? Justin M. Streiner (Oct 19)
- Re: Pad 1310nm cross-connects? Måns Nilsson (Oct 19)
- Re: Pad 1310nm cross-connects? Måns Nilsson (Oct 20)
- Re: Pad 1310nm cross-connects? Sam Roche (Oct 20)
- Re: Pad 1310nm cross-connects? Eric Litvin (Oct 20)
- Re: Pad 1310nm cross-connects? joel jaeggli (Oct 20)
- Re: Pad 1310nm cross-connects? Justin M. Streiner (Oct 20)
- Re: Pad 1310nm cross-connects? Leo Bicknell (Oct 20)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Pad 1310nm cross-connects? Brandon Butterworth (Oct 20)