nanog mailing list archives

Re: common method to count traffic volume on IX


From: Niels Bakker <niels=nanog () bakker net>
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 00:55:27 +0200

* bicknell () ufp org (Leo Bicknell) [Wed 18 Sep 2013, 19:23 CEST]:
On Sep 17, 2013, at 3:15 PM, Niels Bakker <niels=nanog () bakker net> wrote:
I don't know of any IXP that does this. Industry standard is as you and others wrote before: the 5-minute counter difference on all customer-facing ports, publishing both input and output bps and pps. I guess MRTG is to 'blame' for these values more than anything.

Serious question, at an IXP shouldn't IN = OUT nearly perfectly?

Ding ding ding! And that's why honest IXPs graph both, to show that they have no packet loss on their inter-switch links.

(Or, much more likely, measurement errors due to wrong config for the grapher)


        -- Niels.


Current thread: