nanog mailing list archives
Re: common method to count traffic volume on IX
From: Niels Bakker <niels=nanog () bakker net>
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 13:32:44 +0200
* randy () psg com (Randy Bush) [Thu 19 Sep 2013, 03:16 CEST]:
you gotta love the amsix hkg charlie foxtrot.and how is that working out financially for the amsix members, the folk in the amsterdam area the amsix purportedly serves, niels?
All relevant paperwork including business plans was made available to the full membership and you can download it at my.ams-ix.net.
I know you're a busy man so the tl;dr is that by encouraging local peering more networks will start to peer, and by partnering with one or more local carriers those new networks as well as established players in those markets can connect to the home exchange point too, increasing value for all connected parties.
Also, what Neil J. McRae said in his email in this thread. Regards, -- Niels.
Current thread:
- Re: common method to count traffic volume on IX, (continued)
- Re: common method to count traffic volume on IX Niels Bakker (Sep 18)
- Re: common method to count traffic volume on IX Stephen Fulton (Sep 18)
- Re: common method to count traffic volume on IX Nick Hilliard (Sep 18)
- Re: common method to count traffic volume on IX Niels Bakker (Sep 19)
- Re: common method to count traffic volume on IX Nick Hilliard (Sep 18)
- Re: common method to count traffic volume on IX Patrick W. Gilmore (Sep 17)
- Re: common method to count traffic volume on IX Niels Bakker (Sep 18)
- Re: common method to count traffic volume on IX Randy Bush (Sep 18)
- Re: common method to count traffic volume on IX Randy Bush (Sep 18)
- Re: common method to count traffic volume on IX Niels Bakker (Sep 19)
- Re: common method to count traffic volume on IX Will Hargrave (Sep 19)
- Re: common method to count traffic volume on IX sthaug (Sep 19)
- common method to count traffic volume on IX Martin Hannigan (Sep 19)