Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size

[bmanning () vacation karoshi com]

 sounds just like folks in 1985, talking about IPv4...


/bill


On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 06:45:02AM -0700, Owen DeLong wrote:
> Each site should get at least a /48.
>
> Stop worrying about dense-packing the IP space in IPv6. This is IPv4-think. IPv6 is intended to be sparsely allocated.
>
> Owen
>
> On Sep 24, 2013, at 8:10 PM, Nathanael C. Cariaga <nccariaga () stluke com ph> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I raised actually this concern during our IP resource application.
> >
> > On a personal note, I think /48 IPv6 allocation is more than enough for our organization to use for at least the 
> > next 5-10 years assuming that this can be farmed out to our multiple sites. What makes this complicated for us is 
> > that we are operating on a multiple sites (geographically) with each site is doing multi-homing and having a /48 in 
> > each site would be very big waste of IP resources.
> >
> > -nathan
> >
> > On 9/25/2013 2:36 AM, Bryan Socha wrote:
> > > Everyone is following the same policies.   a /48 PER SITE.    did you
> > > request enough addresses from your RIR?
> > >
> > > Bryan Socha