nanog mailing list archives
Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size
From: Brandon Ross <bross () pobox com>
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 10:40:15 -0400 (EDT)
On Fri, 27 Sep 2013, Ryan McIntosh wrote:
It's a waste, even if we're "planning for the future", no one house needs a /64 sitting on their lan.. or at least none I can sensibly think of o_O.
Okay, I'm just curious, what size do you (and other's of similar opinion) think the IPv6 space _should_ have been in order to allow us to not have to jump through conservation hoops ever again? 128 bits isn't enough, clearly, 256? 1k? 10k?
-- Brandon Ross Yahoo & AIM: BrandonNRoss +1-404-635-6667 ICQ: 2269442 Schedule a meeting: https://doodle.com/bross Skype: brandonross
Current thread:
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size, (continued)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size bmanning (Sep 26)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Patrick (Sep 26)
- RE: minimum IPv6 announcement size Azinger, Marla (Sep 26)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Darren Pilgrim (Sep 26)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size joel jaeggli (Sep 26)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Darren Pilgrim (Sep 26)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size William Herrin (Sep 26)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size joel jaeggli (Sep 26)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size bmanning (Sep 26)
- Message not available
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Ryan McIntosh (Sep 27)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Brandon Ross (Sep 27)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Joe Abley (Sep 27)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size William Herrin (Sep 27)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Randy Carpenter (Sep 27)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size joel jaeggli (Sep 27)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Randy Carpenter (Sep 27)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size William Herrin (Sep 27)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size William Herrin (Sep 27)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Matt Palmer (Sep 27)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Owen DeLong (Sep 27)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Randy Bush (Sep 26)