nanog mailing list archives

Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size


From: Brandon Ross <bross () pobox com>
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 10:40:15 -0400 (EDT)

On Fri, 27 Sep 2013, Ryan McIntosh wrote:

It's a waste, even if we're "planning for the future", no one house
needs a /64 sitting on their lan.. or at least none I can sensibly
think of o_O.

Okay, I'm just curious, what size do you (and other's of similar opinion) think the IPv6 space _should_ have been in order to allow us to not have to jump through conservation hoops ever again? 128 bits isn't enough, clearly, 256? 1k? 10k?

--
Brandon Ross                                      Yahoo & AIM:  BrandonNRoss
+1-404-635-6667                                                ICQ:  2269442
Schedule a meeting:  https://doodle.com/bross            Skype:  brandonross


Current thread: