nanog mailing list archives
Re: Updated ARIN allocation information
From: Phil Rosenthal <pr () isprime com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 10:55:55 -0500
On Jan 29, 2014, at 10:22 PM, Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com> wrote:
maybe these weren't meant to be used outside the local ASN? :) I do wonder though what the purpose of this block is? If it's to be used inside the local ASN (as seems to be indicated based upon minimum allocation sizes) then why not use the IETF marked 100.64/10 space instead? Global-uniqueness? ok, sure...
Seems like the obvious use case is for 6to4 NAT gateways, which would mean that global reachability would be expected. -Phil
Current thread:
- Re: Updated ARIN allocation information, (continued)
- Re: Updated ARIN allocation information Mark Andrews (Jan 30)
- Re: Updated ARIN allocation information Justin M. Streiner (Jan 30)
- Re: Updated ARIN allocation information Mark Andrews (Jan 30)
- Re: Updated ARIN allocation information John Curran (Jan 31)
- Re: Updated ARIN allocation information Matt Palmer (Jan 31)
- Re: Updated ARIN allocation information William Herrin (Jan 31)
- Re: Updated ARIN allocation information Owen DeLong (Jan 31)
- Re: Updated ARIN allocation information Mark Andrews (Jan 31)
- Re: Updated ARIN allocation information Owen DeLong (Jan 31)
- Re: Updated ARIN allocation information Owen DeLong (Jan 30)
- Re: Updated ARIN allocation information Phil Rosenthal (Jan 30)
- Re: FW: Updated ARIN allocation information William Herrin (Jan 30)