nanog mailing list archives
Re: While on the subject of IRR and route objects
From: Job Snijders <job.snijders () hibernianetworks com>
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 15:04:48 +0100
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 08:58:06AM -0500, Alain Hebert wrote:
IRRToolset 5.0.1 (rtconfig really) finally gave out on a pretty messy RPSL parse. After a few hours of research, it seems that its dead since 2009 :(. There is some effort at http://irrtoolset.isc.org to reboot development, its pretty dead since 2012-07-31. Beside home made solutions, there seems to be no commercial package. Any lead will be appreciated.
I really like bgpq3 for prefix-filter generation. http://github.com/snar/bgpq3 http://snar.spb.ru/prog/bgpq3/ Kind regards, Job
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Are specific "route" objects in RIR databases needed? Martin T (Jan 30)
- Re: Are specific "route" objects in RIR databases needed? Job Snijders (Jan 30)
- Re: Are specific "route" objects in RIR databases needed? Tore Anderson (Jan 30)
- Re: Are specific "route" objects in RIR databases needed? Martin T (Jan 30)
- Re: Are specific "route" objects in RIR databases needed? Darren O'Connor (Jan 30)
- While on the subject of IRR and route objects Alain Hebert (Jan 31)
- Re: While on the subject of IRR and route objects Job Snijders (Jan 31)
- Re: While on the subject of IRR and route objects ML (Jan 31)
- Re: While on the subject of IRR and route objects Nick Hilliard (Jan 31)
- Re: While on the subject of IRR and route objects Alain Hebert (Jan 31)
- Re: While on the subject of IRR and route objects Job Snijders (Jan 31)
- Re: While on the subject of IRR and route objects Alain Hebert (Jan 31)
- Re: Are specific "route" objects in RIR databases needed? Tore Anderson (Jan 30)
- Re: Are specific "route" objects in RIR databases needed? Job Snijders (Jan 30)