nanog mailing list archives
Re: While on the subject of IRR and route objects
From: Alain Hebert <ahebert () pubnix net>
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 11:47:38 -0500
Yes, its the first thing I tried. Iti's still ~82k =D The as-set included some of his peering as export too. We're both looking into it. ----- Alain Hebert ahebert () pubnix net PubNIX Inc. 50 boul. St-Charles P.O. Box 26770 Beaconsfield, Quebec H9W 6G7 Tel: 514-990-5911 http://www.pubnix.net Fax: 514-990-9443 On 01/31/14 11:38, Job Snijders wrote:
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 11:32:17AM -0500, Alain Hebert wrote:bgpq3 works great the as-set that was borking rtlookup generate a ~183k long prefix list =D.I recommend using it like this, to enable aggregation where possible: bgpq3 -A Kind regards, Job
Current thread:
- Re: Are specific "route" objects in RIR databases needed?, (continued)
- Re: Are specific "route" objects in RIR databases needed? Job Snijders (Jan 30)
- Re: Are specific "route" objects in RIR databases needed? Tore Anderson (Jan 30)
- Re: Are specific "route" objects in RIR databases needed? Martin T (Jan 30)
- Re: Are specific "route" objects in RIR databases needed? Darren O'Connor (Jan 30)
- While on the subject of IRR and route objects Alain Hebert (Jan 31)
- Re: While on the subject of IRR and route objects Job Snijders (Jan 31)
- Re: While on the subject of IRR and route objects ML (Jan 31)
- Re: While on the subject of IRR and route objects Nick Hilliard (Jan 31)
- Re: While on the subject of IRR and route objects Alain Hebert (Jan 31)
- Re: While on the subject of IRR and route objects Job Snijders (Jan 31)
- Re: While on the subject of IRR and route objects Alain Hebert (Jan 31)
- Re: Are specific "route" objects in RIR databases needed? Tore Anderson (Jan 30)
- Re: Are specific "route" objects in RIR databases needed? Job Snijders (Jan 30)