nanog mailing list archives

Re: Verizon Public Policy on Netflix


From: Scott Helms <khelms () zcorum com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 10:19:05 -0400

Isn't it interesting how that coincides with pay per bit (for the most
part) pricing.


Scott Helms
Vice President of Technology
ZCorum
(678) 507-5000
--------------------------------
http://twitter.com/kscotthelms
--------------------------------


On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 10:12 AM, Ca By <cb.list6 () gmail com> wrote:

On Jul 22, 2014 7:04 AM, "Jared Mauch" <jared () puck nether net> wrote:

Verizon wireless has other transits apart from 701.


That's interesting that they have a different capacity management strategy
for the competitive wireless market than they have for their captive
landline customers.

Seems market forces are making wireless a functional network without the
peering brinksmanship while market failings are allowing landline to take
advantage of a captive install base

Sent via telepathy

On Jul 22, 2014, at 9:01 AM, Ca By <cb.list6 () gmail com> wrote:

Question: does verizon wireless have a different capacity / peering
practice from verizon broadband ? Or do verizon wireless customers
 also
suffer the same performance issue?



Current thread: