nanog mailing list archives
Re: Carrier Grade NAT
From: Robert Drake <rdrake () direcpath com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 13:00:23 -0400
On 7/29/2014 12:42 PM, Chris Boyd wrote:
Usually, unless the judge is being super generous, they'll provide a timestamp and a destination IP. That should be pretty unique unless they're looking for fraud against large website or something. In the unlikely event that two people hit the same IP at the same time(window) they would probably just throw that information out as unusable for their case.There's probably going to be some interesting legal fallout from that practice. As an ISP customer, I'd be furious to find out that my communications had been intercepted due to the bad behavior of another user. --Chris
Usually the window they give is ~ 3-5 seconds so they're pretty specific.
Current thread:
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT, (continued)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 29)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Matt Palmer (Jul 29)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Chris Boyd (Jul 29)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Owen DeLong (Jul 29)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 29)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Owen DeLong (Jul 29)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Livingood, Jason (Jul 29)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT John Levine (Jul 29)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT William Herrin (Jul 29)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Owen DeLong (Jul 29)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Robert Drake (Jul 29)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Owen DeLong (Jul 29)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Simon Perreault (Jul 29)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Lee Howard (Jul 29)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Matt Palmer (Jul 29)
- RE: Carrier Grade NAT Tony Wicks (Jul 29)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Lee Howard (Jul 29)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Matt Palmer (Jul 29)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Robert Drake (Jul 29)
- RE: Carrier Grade NAT Tony Wicks (Jul 29)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Mark Andrews (Jul 29)