nanog mailing list archives
Re: Carrier Grade NAT
From: Matt Palmer <mpalmer () hezmatt org>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 06:05:35 +1000
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 11:42:31AM -0500, Chris Boyd wrote:
On Jul 29, 2014, at 10:23 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:If law enforcement comes along without port numbers then you give them a list of subscribers behind that IP at the time. Use port block allocation and keep track of the blocks to reduce logging load.There's probably going to be some interesting legal fallout from that practice. As an ISP customer, I'd be furious to find out that my communications had been intercepted due to the bad behavior of another user.
Then you'll no doubt be happy to know that you're very, very unlikely to ever find out. - Matt
Current thread:
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT, (continued)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 29)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Owen DeLong (Jul 29)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Livingood, Jason (Jul 29)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT John Levine (Jul 29)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT William Herrin (Jul 29)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Owen DeLong (Jul 29)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Robert Drake (Jul 29)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Owen DeLong (Jul 29)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Simon Perreault (Jul 29)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Lee Howard (Jul 29)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Matt Palmer (Jul 29)
- RE: Carrier Grade NAT Tony Wicks (Jul 29)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Lee Howard (Jul 29)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Matt Palmer (Jul 29)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Robert Drake (Jul 29)
- RE: Carrier Grade NAT Tony Wicks (Jul 29)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Mark Andrews (Jul 29)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Matt Palmer (Jul 29)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Mark Andrews (Jul 29)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Owen DeLong (Jul 29)
- Re: Carrier Grade NAT Julien Goodwin (Jul 29)