nanog mailing list archives
Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion
From: Niels Bakker <niels=nanog () bakker net>
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 18:56:17 +0200
* mail () martingeddes com (Martin Geddes) [Wed 18 Jun 2014, 18:17 CEST]:
It may never become the defacto standard, period. Nearly 20 years to reach 2% penetration is a strong hint that the costs outweigh the benefits.
Never before have we run out of IPv4 address space, so this time may well be different, now that an actual need for change is developing.
[..]
their membership of the Seven Layer Adventists as a result. Yes, the
Nobody outside academia considers the OSI model a valid representation of the Internet.
-- Niels.
Current thread:
- Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Jay Ashworth (Jun 17)
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Lee Howard (Jun 17)
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Jared Mauch (Jun 17)
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Jeroen Massar (Jun 17)
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Andrew Fried (Jun 17)
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Martin Geddes (Jun 18)
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Niels Bakker (Jun 18)
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Owen DeLong (Jun 18)
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Seth Mos (Jun 18)
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Owen DeLong (Jun 18)
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Ricky Beam (Jun 19)
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Justin M. Streiner (Jun 19)
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Ricky Beam (Jun 19)
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Jared Mauch (Jun 17)
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Owen DeLong (Jun 19)
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Brandon Ross (Jun 19)
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Lee Howard (Jun 17)
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion Lee Howard (Jun 18)
- Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion TJ (Jun 18)