nanog mailing list archives
Re: MACsec SFP
From: Saku Ytti <saku () ytti fi>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 19:07:43 +0300
On (2014-06-24 11:50 -0400), Christopher Morrow wrote:
Programmable seems like the way to go, provided there's a path to do that in the cli of the device you plugged the SFP into? (which I think is the hard part actually, right?)
Solution could be same as for tunable optics, first you tune with eeprommer until CLI gets support. Remote legs could have their own eeprommer, which can be easy enough to use not to require training and costs like 10EUR. Maybe some customer would then enter need for this in CLI in their multimillion dollar RFQ, and then we'd get the feature. -- ++ytti
Current thread:
- Re: MACsec SFP, (continued)
- Re: MACsec SFP Pieter Hulshoff (Jun 24)
- Re: MACsec SFP Jonathan Lassoff (Jun 24)
- Re: MACsec SFP Saku Ytti (Jun 24)
- Re: MACsec SFP Pieter Hulshoff (Jun 24)
- Re: MACsec SFP Saku Ytti (Jun 24)
- Re: MACsec SFP Pieter Hulshoff (Jun 24)
- Re: MACsec SFP Pieter Hulshoff (Jun 24)
- RE: MACsec SFP Frank Bulk (iname.com) (Jun 24)
- Re: MACsec SFP Christopher Morrow (Jun 24)
- Re: MACsec SFP Pieter Hulshoff (Jun 24)
- Re: MACsec SFP Christopher Morrow (Jun 24)
- Re: MACsec SFP Saku Ytti (Jun 24)
- Re: MACsec SFP Christopher Morrow (Jun 24)
- Re: MACsec SFP Saku Ytti (Jun 24)
- Re: MACsec SFP Christopher Morrow (Jun 24)
- Re: MACsec SFP Eric Flanery (eric) (Jun 24)
- Re: MACsec SFP Pieter Hulshoff (Jun 25)
- Re: MACsec SFP Eric Flanery (eric) (Jun 25)
- Re: MACsec SFP Saku Ytti (Jun 25)
- Re: MACsec SFP Tim Durack (Jun 25)
- Re: MACsec SFP Randy Bush (Jun 24)
- Re: MACsec SFP Christopher Morrow (Jun 24)